Being out of the United States for the last year I've had what has probably been a blessing in only getting snippets of the country's political news every month or so rather than the everyday sensationalized blown out of proportion bombardement I received living in the suburbs of Washington DC. I think getting the news every once in awhile maybe gives me more insight into how repetitive it is. Hearing it repeated over and over every day in slightly different words maybe almost convinces one that they are hearing something different, yet every month I am shocked at how little any of it changes.
President Obama is always talking about working together, and this alternative universe he lives in where he thinks it is great that everyone in America can be friends and do things together. Then there is always some maniac Republican of the moment shouting about how Obama is a socialist, a terrorist, a foreigner, or whatever other scary words they come up with, and how the rich people who took the economy apart have no obligation to the people whose jobs they imploded. And members of the media always pretending to be disgusted by some outrageous comment this person made while at the same time devoting 24 hours a day to obsessively dissecting the comments they make, blowing them up into superstar celebrities.
Most demoralizing of all is the never ending debate about whether government can do anything productive at all. Its a debate that feels like it is taking place in this isolated, padded room where nothing else that takes place anywhere outside of that room matters. It goes on and on like running on a treadmill without any new points ever being reached. We are told over and over that government can do NOTHING to improve economic growth, and that if taxes go up from where they are now the United States economy cannot possibly grow. We are told that no government who taxes more than ours does and spends more money on anything to help people can possibly be successful.
And we buy into this mentality, while ignoring the fact that the Chinese economy is growing at a rate basically unprecedented in the history of the world, while the government mixes socialism and capitalism, organizing capital and labor to bring them together where they can be used most efficiently. And we still scream about how government regulation can accomplish nothing as Brazil's economy continues to grow through the economic crisis and most economic experts say the reason is that they ignored US economist’s advice to deregulate their banking system. It is impossible for a government that spends money on social programs to succeed we are told, as President Lula finished his second term last year with an approval rating over 90 percent, managing to dramatically increase spending on social services while at the same time growing the economy throughout the worldwide economic crisis. And we are told that anyone who talks about Europe doing anything right is a traitor to the blessed USA. I try to ignore the European backpackers who spend 6 months at a time on vacation in Central America and not compare them to the Americans I meet who away for a weekend breaks or perhaps a week and a half vacation. It is un-American to acknowledge that European economies somehow managed to grow through the 90s and 2000's while their governments protected workers rights to an amount of vacation time most Americans barely would even dream is possible. It’s better not to analyze living conditions in the US and Europe and just think "socialist" immediately whenever you hear the word Europe, it’s much easier on the brain.
Then I look around me at Honduras, a country that the United States has run since it was a Spanish colony, and a country the US has always advised (read: ordered) to have government spending rates of around 0%. I look at the city of 70,000 people I live in with only 4 paved roads, where the dust from cars on the disrepaired dirt roads makes it almost impossible to breathe. Where the government hasn't felt an obligation to bring water or electricity to anyone, and even many upper class people have running water 2 days out of 7. The government doesn't have money to defend its citizens, so there is virtually no police force, and the rich ride around in armored cars with private security while the poor have no one to defend them at all. I wonder if this is what some American politicians aspire to, a world where NOTHING is guaranteed to those who don't have enough money to provide it for themselves.
Even if you want to look at the US in a vacuum and ignore any examples from the rest of the world, US history contradicts this view that high spending and taxing can never work. The US economy grew the most it ever has in the period after World War II, which was also when we had the highest tax rate on the wealthy (over 90% on the super rich). So while Rush Limbaugh will go on and on about how a .2 percent increase in the tax rate paid by the wealthiest people will stifle growth and absolutely ruin our economy, US history proves that the economy can grow no matter how much you tax the rich. Not only that, but the growth the US experienced after the war led to much decreasing levels of inequality. You know, more money going to the "real Americans" in the heartland rather than to the "elitist" New York bankers that Republicans love to get their donations from and then rail against. Maybe the next Republican President will decree that US history began with Ronald Reagan, the greatest figure in our history, and then the history of our post war growth will no longer be around to contradict their talking points.
I feel often like American politicians hide behind this debate over whether government is inherently good or evil to avoid a debate over whether they are doing a good job in government. Governments can obviously do bad things; the Holocaust and Stalin's purges were led by governments. Most of the wars that kill so many of us are started by governments. Yet its equally obvious that governments can also do good things to, like building the interstate highway system or developing the medicare system that allowed older Americans to afford the medicines they need to survive without working through their retirement. So I find it equally ridiculous when politicians take this view that government spending is inherently good and should always be increased, I want to know what we're talking about spending money on. I think spending on things like concentration camps, for example, should be kept low while spending on education should be high. But American politicians don't want to talk about whether our government is spending money on the right or wrong things, they would rather argue about whether government is inherently good or bad, and many would like to pretend that it is impossible for government to do a good job at all. Then when they fail horribly at their own job like President Bush after Hurricane Katrina, they can argue that it is because government in general is horribly incompetent. It is not that Bush appointed incompetent people; it is that Bush was part of government, so it was impossible for him to be anything but an incompetent failure! Their own failures just feed into their view that you shouldn't count on government to do anything right. Can we just once before the next election talk about a strategy to make government work better or more efficiently, rather than just talking about whether or not government should exist?
For all these reasons, I feel like for my sanity it is better to tune out the political debates in the States altogether. My father recently told me I am wrong that it is staying the same and the debate is actually getting more and more angry and nasty. Yet I just can’t go on watching people constantly debating things that have already been proven if you look at the world or at US history at al. I can't imagine being like Paul Krugman, a Nobel Prize winning mind following the news cycle and writing the same exact arguments that should be so obvious over and over every week. If all of history hasn't proved that the economy can survive a .2 percent increase in taxes paid by the rich, what can a weekly column possibly do? Obviously the people in power and their constituency don't want to listen to reality or logic, no matter how clearly it is presented.


